Best case is to read the markings on your current prop. He's right about the shaft size, etc. (see the "inch and an eighth!!!" thread). BTW, that's for an S22, not an X.
If I were you, I'd beg borrow or steal a handheld GPS and create your own table like this:
Just mapped a few weeks ago (Epic S22, no ballast, full fuel tank, OJ Stainless 4-blade 13x13)
RPM? ? ? ? MPH (GPS)
2000? ? ? ? ? ?9.5
2500? ? ? ? ?17.7
3000? ? ? ? ?24.1
3500? ? ? ? ?28.9
4000? ? ? ? ?32.6
4500? ? ? ? ?36.0
5000? ? ? ? ?38.9
5500? ? ? ? ?41.3
5780? ? ? ? ?42.8
And finally, (while I was looking for those figures in the archives)....
Sorry to repeat this, but is still applies...When you call ACME, they're gonna primarily replace your current prop. This means that they assume their 13x12 5/8 prop is the quivalent to the stock prop. Kinda like us 1.26:1 guys that were told to replace 13x13 with 13x11.5 ACME. To that they might adjust a little based on your stated preferences regarding ballast or skiing, etc.
My first step will be to say, "my WOT throttle RPM is 5800, so the current 13x13 4-blade OJ Stainless is a little tall to start with." Let's say that 200 rpm equals 1/2" of pitch, and that the prop specialized for all-around runabout stuff would become 13x12.5. I ask him which ACME prop would be the quivalent to the theoretical 13x12.5 OJ stainless 4-blade. He tells me "that's the ACME XXX, a 13x11.5 three-blade."
To this, I ask for like 500 rpm (or more, just a guess right now) to improve hole shot with weight and improve throttle response at 22 mph. He says, "alrighty then, you're now in for an ACME 3-blade 13x11." I put down the visa and go wait for the UPS guy.
That might change me from 5800 RPM and 43 MPH GPS to like 6000 RPM and 37 MPH GPS. Pretty heavy hit to top speed, but the extra 500 rpm at wakeboarding speed would probably make the thing into a different boat.
There's an article in the latest WBM that talks about propping your boat and that just because you have Perfect Pass, there are still benefits to downshifting your prop. Besides quicker time to plane and better speed control, they claimed that thequick hole shot will end up saving you gas. I've always wondered how the scale tips in the 'quicker hole shot vs. higher rpms all day' battle. The article did say thatt he higher rpms increase wear on the drivetrain.
So that about sums it up ;-) Go get a GPS, spend some quality time on the lake by yourself, no ballast and a full tank of fuel and carefully plot your speeds. I'd do three columns: RPM at 500-rpm intervals between 2000 and WOT whatever that is. Record both indicated speed and GPS. To get the <2500 rpm readings, come up on plane and then back down. I'd also get a data reading at 22 MPH (RPM and indicated speed at 25 GPS).
Anyhoo, when you get back with ACME, you'll have two important figures: WOT speed and RPM & wakeboarding speed and RPM. Plus, hopefully you'll have read the markings (or better yet, taken a pic of them) and know the current prop mfr and part number, blade count, diameter, pitch, shaft diameter.
The thing about correcting for altitude is how much you want to optimize for your home lake's elevation. Just know that if you dial in for 4000 feet and then go to sea level, you'll be turning higher RPM. Just be aware of it. Heck, you'll have a spare prop that's already pitched for sea level!