Differences of opinion are a great thing, and you must take what each of us say with a grain of salt.
Pete said dickhead ;-)
Cal, the wake. I agree that it stays cleaner farther back and at slower speeds than the two SANs and the Avalanche I've ridden behind. I like your '01 X-star review because that wake has a great rep when made pro-size. The SAN's awesome from empty to

?? Some people are really into their wakeboarding and seem to try to improve by fixing the easy stuff - gotta have the park board, the Parks bindings, the yellow jacket line, the sweet jacket, slickest slime, most CNC-d prop, absolute best ballast density, and oh yeah, 'best wake'. What's best wake mean, well as far as SANs go, these guys like popping up. SAN's great for going up, and I found it to be very consistent. With ballast it gets big, but it's always firm and fun.
From my experience, the v-drive Epic has a very clean wake with less steepness. Unballasted, the wake is soft and small. Sure, with good technique you'll still go up, but it's much easier to to go far than high. With ballast it gets bigger and much firmer, and up is definietely happening. Nice gradual transition, which I like. With 1500 and just a few people, we can drive down to 20 mph and still have clean lips with one section out of the rope. A SAN would be crumbly.
Everybody says that a narrower boat will be more easily sunk, and ours are not narrow. A SAN is narrow (and short) which is another reason I'm happy with mine.
It's an amazing boat, and I'd have nothing else. However, even Travis Moye says that that '01 X-Star will easily outdo an Epic. I believe him for one simple reason: you can put 3,000 in an X-star or SAN and get out of the water. Try that in an Epic...
...without a supercharger ;-)